PC3I News
Financial incentives are often successful at increasing preventive health behaviors, like exercising or smoking cessation, but a recently published study by PC3I’s Alicia Clifton, MDP, Kate Rendle, PhD, MSW, MPH, and Shivan Mehta, MD, MBA, MSHP explored why this behavioral intervention has shown limited impact on colorectal cancer screening to date.
This study was conducted as part of a four-arm trial in which patients due for screening were mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits, an at-home screening tool for colorectal cancer. All patients received the mailed FIT kit, but depending on which study arm patients were assigned, they received no incentive at all, an unconditional incentive ($10) with the kit, a conditional incentive ($10) only if the kit was completed, or chance to receive $100 (1-in-10 lottery) if the kit was completed. The financial incentives, however, did not have a significant effect on at-home screening, with less than one third of patients completing the kit across the board. The researchers wanted to understand why.
They conducted follow-up interviews to examine patients’ attitudes and beliefs related to screening and how financial incentives may or may not affect their decision to get screened. Of 60 interview participants, the majority (68%) of which identified as Black, 82% shared that incentives would not change their decision, and of those, most expressed that they would complete the FIT kit regardless of whether there was an incentive in place. The perceived benefits from screening itself were viewed as sufficient motivators, and authors concluded that other interventions like reminders might better address their reasons for low completion. There was a small set of participants who did convey that a financial incentive might motivate them to get screened. These patients were less likely than the first group to perceive a health benefit to getting screened. With lower perceived benefits, the authors concluded that financial incentives might be an effective way to provide sufficient motivation for screening.
These nuances in motivations suggest that financial incentives may be more impactful if they are adapted to patient screening beliefs. Tailoring the type of colorectal cancer screening intervention based on such differences may serve as an effective way to increase CRC screening rates.
The paper Exploring Why Financial Incentives Fail to Affect At-home Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Mixed Methods Study, was authored by Alicia Clifton, MDP; Shivan Mehta, MD, MBA, MSHP; Jocelyn Wainwright, MS; Shannon Ogden, MPH; Chelsea Saia, MPH; and Katharine Rendle, PhD, MSW, MPH, and appeared in the Journal of General Internal Medicine on January 17, 2022.
Related News
PC3I News
Cancer Service Line & PC3I Select 2024 Innovation Accelerator Project
04.22.2024
The Cancer Service Line (CSL) and the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation (PC3I) have announced the selection of the 2024 Penn Cancer Innovation Accelerator project. The chosen project, submitted by Katie Boyk, BS, MHA, will identify solutions to improve cancer care scheduling workflows for patients, clinicians, and staff.
PC3I News
PC3I and Tennessee Oncology’s McKay Institute for Oncology Transformation Unveil New Collaborative Relationship
02.06.2024
PC3I and Tennessee Oncology’s McKay Institute for Oncology Transformation announce an academic-community oncology innovation partnership to improve cancer care delivery.
PC3I News
PC3I Leadership Presents at 2023 AORTIC International Conference on Cancer in Africa
12.05.2023
PC3I Associate Director Surbhi Grover and Deputy Director Katharine Rendle presented research at the 14th AORTIC International Conference on Cancer in Africa, which took place in Dakar, Senegal.